On December 8, 1998, the Australian Cricket Board revealed that Mark Waugh and Shane Warne had been fined in 1995 for accepting cash from an Indian bookmaker named 'John' (later identified as Mukesh Gupta) in exchange for pitch and weather information. The ACB had concealed the fines for three years. The cover-up became a bigger scandal than the original incident.
Mukesh 'John' Gupta was a Delhi bookmaker who had been cultivating international cricketers for information since the early 1990s. He was the same bookmaker who allegedly paid Hansie Cronje from 1996 onwards. Salim Malik's separate Karachi 1994 bribe attempt was happening at the same time.
During Australia's 1994 Sri Lanka tour, Mark Waugh accepted approximately US$5,000 from a man calling himself 'John' (later identified as Mumbai bookmaker Mukesh Gupta) in exchange for pitch and weather information. Shane Warne was paid a similar amount. Both reported the contacts to the ACB in 1995. The ACB fined both players ($10,000 Waugh, $8,000 Warne) and kept it private. In December 1998, ahead of the South Africa tour, Australian newspapers — tipped off by sources — broke the cover-up story. The ACB chairman Denis Rogers had to convene a press conference to confirm the facts. Both players were fined retrospectively in 1995 but the cover-up infuriated the cricket public. Waugh and Warne separately gave testimony to the Justice Qayyum inquiry in Pakistan and the King Commission in South Africa, both of which deepened the scandal. Neither player was banned. Both went on to play for Australia for years more, but the incident permanently darkened their reputations.
1994 Sri Lanka tour: Gupta pays Waugh and Warne
1995: Both report to ACB; both fined privately
ACB conceals the fines for three years
December 8, 1998: Australian newspapers break the story
ACB chairman Denis Rogers confirms cover-up
Players testify to Qayyum and King commissions in 1999-2000
1994 Sri Lanka tour
Mukesh Gupta pays Waugh and Warne.
1995
ACB fines both privately, concealing details.
December 8, 1998
Australian newspapers expose the cover-up.
1999-2000
Players testify to Qayyum and King commissions.
“I was naive. I should have known better. I'm sorry I took the money.”
“It was a stupid thing to do. I told the board. They fined me. I thought that was it.”
Both players continued international careers for years. Mark Waugh retired in 2002; Warne in 2007. The cover-up was widely seen as worse than the original act because it created an institutional precedent for keeping integrity issues private. The ACB reformed its anti-corruption processes after the 1998 revelation.
A messy case where the cover-up was the real scandal. Two great Australian cricketers compromised their reputations with poor judgment in 1994; the ACB compounded it with a three-year cover-up.
The 1998 revelation set the template for how the cricket world would handle subsequent corruption cases — full disclosure rather than private fines. Mark Waugh and Shane Warne's reputations recovered partially over time, but the incident remains a permanent footnote in their Wikipedia entries.
Cricket Canada
12 May 2026
ICC suspended six months of funding to Cricket Canada over governance failures and financial misreporting — 63% of their total revenue.
Multiple franchises
8 May 2026
The IPL's Anti-Corruption and Security Unit (ACSU) submitted a formal report to the BCCI in May 2026 flagging "certain anomalies" observed across the league stage: unauthorised persons had been seen in the team dugout, on the team bus, and at team hotels during IPL matches in apparent breach of anti-corruption Standard Operating Procedures. IPL chairman Arun Dhumal confirmed the report publicly and warned that "very stringent action" would be taken if violations continued. Separately, the BCCI tightened protocols after reports that certain franchise owners had been seen mingling with players in restricted areas — a specific interaction prohibited under the anti-corruption framework.
Various county sides
1865-08-01
Despite MCC's attempts to reduce gambling on cricket through the 1840s and 1850s, county cricket in the 1860s still operated in a culture where betting was widespread and where allegations of arranged results circulated freely among those closest to the game. Several county fixtures of the decade generated suspicion among contemporaries that the outcome had been agreed in advance, though the absence of formal investigation meant that no players were ever charged.