The ICC's 2016 proposal to divide Test cricket into two tiers — with promotion and relegation — was opposed so ferociously by India, the BCCI, and virtually every player that it was abandoned before implementation, but the debate it sparked about Test cricket's future continues.
The context was Test cricket's commercial struggles. Matches between top nations — Australia vs England, India vs Pakistan — generated enormous revenue. Matches between India vs Zimbabwe or England vs Bangladesh were commercially uninteresting to broadcasters.
The two-tier proposal attempted to solve this by concentrating elite Test cricket between the best nations. Relegation would theoretically motivate weaker teams to improve — or face the consequences of losing Test status's commercial benefits.
The proposal emerged from discussions led by the ECB and Cricket Australia, who were increasingly frustrated that Test cricket's future depended on a handful of high-value series. India's BCCI was initially reportedly sympathetic — their primary Tests were against England and Australia regardless.
Pakistan, Sri Lanka, New Zealand, South Africa, West Indies, and Zimbabwe opposed the plan. The players' associations in multiple countries were vocal critics.
In 2016, the ICC's Chief Executives Committee proposed dividing Test-playing nations into two tiers — a top group of seven nations and a lower group, with promotion and relegation between them. The proposal was motivated by concerns about the commercial viability of lopsided Tests between strong and weak nations. Opponents argued it would destroy the fabric of Test cricket — that nations like New Zealand, Sri Lanka, and Zimbabwe could be relegated and potentially lose Test status entirely. India's BCCI, which had recently pushed through a governance structure giving the big three (India, England, Australia) disproportionate power, faced backlash specifically when it appeared willing to support the proposal. The ICC abandoned the plan after overwhelming opposition.
June 2016: ICC publishes discussion document on two-tier Test structure
Immediate backlash from Pakistan, Sri Lanka, West Indies, New Zealand, and Zimbabwe
Kumar Sangakkara and other prominent ex-players write open letters opposing relegation
ECB and Cricket Australia defend the principle while acknowledging concerns
Within weeks: ICC Chief Executives Committee shelves the proposal
2019: World Test Championship introduced as context-giving alternative without relegation
June 2016
Two-tier proposal published by ICC
July 2016
Opposition from smaller nations intensifies; player statements
August 2016
ICC announces proposal withdrawn pending further consultation
2018-19
World Test Championship announced as replacement framework
2021
First WTC Final: New Zealand beat India at Lord's
“Test cricket is not a pyramid — it is a level playing field of nations. Relegation would mean some countries never get to play at the highest level. That is not cricket.”
“The proposal has generated significant discussion. We are continuing to consult with member boards before any decisions are made.”
“The ICC's goal is to grow the game globally. Any structure must be evaluated on whether it achieves that objective.”
The two-tier debate forced the ICC to develop an alternative. The World Test Championship — a nine-team league with a final — was eventually introduced in 2019. It gave Test cricket narrative context and significance across all five-day matches without the existential threat of relegation.
The episode also highlighted the power dynamics within cricket governance — the BCCI's ambivalent position (not actively opposed but not loudly against) was noted by smaller nations as evidence of the big three's indifference to cricket's breadth.
The proposal was withdrawn before any vote was taken. The World Test Championship — a merit-based league playing for a title — was eventually introduced in 2019 as an alternative framework for giving Test cricket context without relegation.
The two-tier proposal remains the most significant abandoned ICC structural change in the modern era. It revealed genuine tensions between Test cricket's egalitarian tradition and its commercial realities.
The World Test Championship, despite some scheduling complexity, succeeded in giving Test cricket meaningful context. Countries like New Zealand winning the inaugural WTC final in 2021 reinforced the argument that a merit-based system without relegation could produce compelling narratives.
ICC vs Cricket World
2005-07-07
The Super Sub rule, introduced in 2005, allowed ODI teams to replace one player mid-match — creating a massive tactical imbalance that rewarded the toss winner and was abandoned within 18 months as one of cricket's most embarrassing regulatory failures.
ICC vs Bowlers Worldwide
2020-07-08
The ICC's temporary COVID-era ban on using saliva to shine the cricket ball became permanent in 2022, eliminating a century-old ball-maintenance practice and permanently disadvantaging bowlers — a decision that continues to divide the sport.
ICC vs Players and Fans
2009-11-01
The 'Umpire's Call' component of DRS — which upholds on-field decisions when the ball is clipping the stumps — was introduced to protect umpire authority but has been consistently criticised for producing outcomes that seem to contradict the purpose of technological review.